The Dialectics of Case Comparison: a Formal Reconstruction
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper is about the dialectics of case comparison as it unfolds in legal case-based reasoning, and its aim is to provide a representation of the phenomenon in formal terms. This is done by formalising argument moves in case comparison concisely in argument schemes, and specifying attack relations between the arguments and their corresponding counterarguments. A feature that is new in research on case comparison is, that in these argument schemes dedicated case denotations are used to refer to the cases under consideration, and that set-theoretic operations on cases appear in the formalised arguments.
منابع مشابه
Rebirth of a city lessons learned from post disaster reconstruction the case study: Rofayye\'
After disasters, one of the main challenges confronting authorities is site selection for reconstructing damaged structures. Experiences indicate that appropriate policies in site-selection could greatly influence on reconstruction success and residents' satisfaction. Meanwhile, in literature related to post disaster reconstruction, avoiding from relocating settlements is generally emphasize...
متن کاملComparison of the postural control between football players fol-lowing ACL reconstruction and healthy subjects
Background :Rupture of the Anterior Cruciate Ligment (ACL) is a common knee injury. The purpose of this study was to determine the balance control in football players with and without ACL reconstruction in posture of injury. Methods : Sway of the center of gravity of 15 patients with ACL reconstruction was compared with 15 healthy, age and sex-matched subjects as the control group. All test...
متن کاملComparison on efficacy of family planning education based on individual education vs health system education
Family planning is programming about future of reproductive reproduction. The main aim of this research was to compare the efficacy of family planning education by individual education in residential place and by health system education. In This quazi-experimental study, 120 married women who did not use any contraceptive for purpose of family planning, don’t have intend to be pregnant, w...
متن کاملAnterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendons Has no Deleterious Effect on Hip Extension Strength
Background: Hamstring tendons are secondary hip extensors. Their harvest for graft in anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) reconstruction may create deleterious effect on hip extension strength. This is of particular importance in sportsthat need powerful hip extension force like climbing and sprinting. Due to scarcity of a comprehensive study in thisarea, we designed this prospect...
متن کاملDefeasible Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach Towards Defeasible Argumentation
Defeasible argumentation is concerned with studying plausible but, at the same time, fallible patterns of reasoning. Because plausible arguments can easily be developed, and not all of them can be in force at the same time, the main thrust of the theory is in deriving sound principles for adjudicating among conflicting lines of argumentation. In this paper, we propose to resolve such conflicts ...
متن کامل